Author: enrico-sorichetti
Subject: Reply to: sort with previous record
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 3:51 am (GMT 5.5)
the explanation seems clear to me ...
a W record is considered as an extension of the preceding record
and the relation should be kept in the sorted output
the only problem - the way the question is posed - is that the sort keys are not properly described
_________________
cheers
enrico
When I tell somebody to RTFM or STFW I usually have the page open in another tab/window of my browser,
so that I am sure that the information requested can be reached with a very small effort![icon_cool.gif]()
Subject: Reply to: sort with previous record
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 3:51 am (GMT 5.5)
the explanation seems clear to me ...
a W record is considered as an extension of the preceding record
and the relation should be kept in the sorted output
the only problem - the way the question is posed - is that the sort keys are not properly described
_________________
cheers
enrico
When I tell somebody to RTFM or STFW I usually have the page open in another tab/window of my browser,
so that I am sure that the information requested can be reached with a very small effort
