Author: enrico-sorichetti
Subject: Reply to: Route a product's job to specific lpar
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:02 pm (GMT 5.5)
IMO the whole discussion is a moot point
If You rely on an hand coded parameter, whatever the choice - CLASS, SYSAFF, ROUTE, SCHENV -
the human error factor will always be there and You will have to live with that ...
_________________
cheers
enrico
When I tell somebody to RTFM or STFW I usually have the page open in another tab/window of my browser,
so that I am sure that the information requested can be reached with a very small effort![icon_cool.gif]()
Subject: Reply to: Route a product's job to specific lpar
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:02 pm (GMT 5.5)
| Quote: |
| but there is a possibility that a user might run a batch job without the SYSAFF parameter and the product would get invoked in the lpar which we don't intend to run. |
IMO the whole discussion is a moot point
If You rely on an hand coded parameter, whatever the choice - CLASS, SYSAFF, ROUTE, SCHENV -
the human error factor will always be there and You will have to live with that ...
_________________
cheers
enrico
When I tell somebody to RTFM or STFW I usually have the page open in another tab/window of my browser,
so that I am sure that the information requested can be reached with a very small effort
