Author: Robert Sample
Posted: Thu May 26, 2016 9:51 pm (GMT 5.5)
Why not just try it instead of posting to a forum? If it works, you'll know and if it doesn't work you'll know - in which case you create another work variable with the mask and move the host variable to it. I am by no means an Easytrieve expert -- I've used it here and there down through the years, but the last site I worked at that had it installed was about 1989 or so (maybe 1998?). I know data and I can Google manuals, which is how I answered the previous question.
_________________
TANSTAAFL
The first rule of code reuse is that the code needs to be worth re-using.
"We should forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time: premature optimization is the root of all evil." -- Donald Knuth
Posted: Thu May 26, 2016 9:51 pm (GMT 5.5)
| Quote: |
| When I run this program, I got an output with binary field displaying as "1,347,376". But expected output should be 1347376. In this case, can I use MASK (99999999) during field declaration? |
_________________
TANSTAAFL
The first rule of code reuse is that the code needs to be worth re-using.
"We should forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time: premature optimization is the root of all evil." -- Donald Knuth