Author: Bill O'Boyle
Subject: Reply to: Inspect statement
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:26 pm (GMT 5.5)
Yes, because an S9(02) COMP-3 field could contain X'00' in the first byte. As far as INSPECT is concerned, this is a legitimate target. It doesn't care about the PICTURE clause, it's an equal opportunity Verb.![icon_lol.gif]()
HTH....
_________________
Nothing in fine print is ever good news.![icon_wink.gif]()
!!!!!!!
ò ¿ ó
(~~)
Mr. Bill
Subject: Reply to: Inspect statement
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:26 pm (GMT 5.5)
Yes, because an S9(02) COMP-3 field could contain X'00' in the first byte. As far as INSPECT is concerned, this is a legitimate target. It doesn't care about the PICTURE clause, it's an equal opportunity Verb.

HTH....
_________________
Nothing in fine print is ever good news.

!!!!!!!
ò ¿ ó
(~~)
Mr. Bill